Free xesochat dating singles online org

Although young-earth creationists challenge the legitimacy of all of the dates obtained by the long-term radiometric methods, even evolutionists are beginning to admit that this dating gap presents a problem for them.

Since the morphology of a fossil cannot be changed, it is obvious that the dating is the more subjective element of the two items.Yet, accurate dating of fossils is so essential that the scientific respectability of evolution is contingent upon fossils having appropriate dates.chat with naughty girls online free, free xesochat, adult sex chattoronto, webcam sexxygirl korean, cam4 in malaysia, scottish sex dating sites, nuda chat without registration without email without password.Popular presentations of human evolution show a rather smooth transition of fossils leading to modern humans.The impression given is that the dating of the individual fossils in that sequence is accurate enough to establish human evolution as a fact.

To present the fossil evidence as a relatively smooth transition leading to modern humans is akin to intellectual dishonesty.It is impossible to give an evolutionary sequence to the human fossils because there is a coverage gap involving the dating methods which evolutionists believe are the most reliable—radiocarbon and potassium-argon (K-Ar).This gap is from about 40,000 ya (years ago) to about 200,000 ya on the evolutionist's time scale.It covers roughly the period known as the Middle Stone Age (MSA).This coverage gap lies beyond what is considered the effective range for radiocarbon and prior to what is considered the effective range for potassium-argon.This problem period may be even larger because: (1) some dating authorities believe that the effective range for K-Ar doesn't begin until about 400,000 ya, and (2) many of the older fossils are found at sites that lack the volcanic rocks necessary for K-Ar dating and hence cannot be dated by this method at all.